Client Portal

Data Center

Access our research through the lens of our charts and tables. View all of our charts (sorted by publishing date) on the left, and click on any chart to read the report in which it appeared.

Select the image you are interested in to load the corresponding report in the content section. This intuitive layout ensures that you can easily find and view reports based on their visual thumbnails.

  • Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
  • Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
  • Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
  • Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
  • Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
  • Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
  • Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:30AM ET
  • Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:30AM ET
  • Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:30AM ET
  • Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:30AM ET
  • Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:30AM ET
  • Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Fundstrat 1Q26 Daily Earnings (EPS) Update – 04/21/2026

    Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:30AM ET
  • VIDEO FLASH: Focus to shift to Earnings and Fed confirmation this week. So far so good on 1Q26 EPS season

    VIDEO FLASH: Focus to shift to Earnings and Fed confirmation this week. So far so good on 1Q26 EPS season

    Mon, April 20, 2026 | 10:53PM ET
  • VIDEO FLASH: Focus to shift to Earnings and Fed confirmation this week. So far so good on 1Q26 EPS season

    VIDEO FLASH: Focus to shift to Earnings and Fed confirmation this week. So far so good on 1Q26 EPS season

    Mon, April 20, 2026 | 10:53PM ET
Tue, April 21, 2026 | 6:43PM ET
Mark L. Newton, CMT

Mark L. Newton, CMT AC

Head of Technical Strategy


Crude bounce seen temporary before a larger plunge

Key Takeaways

  • SPX, QQQ showed minor consolidation only, but no evidence of trend change.
  • Crude oil looks to fall further in the weeks to come; Tuesday’s bounce looks temporary.
  • For those looking for relative outperformance, OIH looks better than either XLE or XOP.

Near-term US Equity trends are positive but nearing overbought levels as SPX and QQQ push higher following their move to new all-time highs, while IWM, Equal-weighted SPX, and DJIA have lagged.  The US Dollar looks to be kicking off its fourth week of declines, while WTI Crude Oil managed to achieve a minor bounce on Monday as part of an ongoing selloff.  Market breadth has lifted to near short-term overbought levels in recent weeks, but Technology is the only of the 11 Equal-weighted ETFs that has pushed back to new all-time highs.  Overall, there remains no evidence thus far of US Equities beginning to consolidate the recent rally. Furthermore, Crude oil looks to be on the verge of a larger decline.  Given that weakness in Crude has directly correlated with rising Equity prices, it still looks early to bet on any Equity selloff getting underway just yet.   Similar to last week’s thinking, it’s right to be long Financials, Technology, and Industrials as sectors overweight, while expecting the Defensive sectors might lag performance. Bottom line, I expect the recent sharp move will likely require consolidation in May.  However, at present, it’s prudent to watch for evidence of trend deterioration before attempting to sell into this rally.  Pullbacks in the next month should be seen as dip-buying opportunities.

Tuesday’s minor consolidation was largely unconvincing that any selloff is starting to get underway.  The late-day gains in WTI Crude oil as the ceasefire window was nearing conclusion should prove short-lived as it’s expected that a unified proposal is in the works.

As shown below, until/unless the short-term uptrend starts to give way, there remains no proof that the next 50-100 points have to be lower.  It’s proper to keep a close eye on market breadth, which should give some evidence of waning prior to any selloff.   Key levels for ^SPX -0.73%  on a closing basis lie near 6993, and a break of this would violate both the uptrend and some minor Ichimoku-based support.

While momentum has begun to slide a bit in the last 24 hours, no trend weakness has occurred, and the sector strength today in Technology, combined with sector weakness in Utilities and Consumer Staples, is thought to still be positive for the risk-on rally to continue.

My expectation is that WTI Crude strength fails to get above $96 before starting to weaken sharply as part of a larger decline. Thus, early weakness in ^SPX -0.73%  on Wednesday is not expected to break the current uptrend before this starts to push back higher.

Technically, one can make a solid case for “one more” move to new highs starting Wednesday, which might allow DeMark-based indicators to line up to show exhaustion to this rally.  For now, these are not in place.

S&P 500 Index

Source: Trading View

Crude oil’s technical pattern is suggestive of a coming decline, which might line up with a more credible peace proposal

The pattern for WTI Crude shows Tuesday’s bounce is not likely to have much more upside before starting to turn down in a more forceful “Wave C, or Wave 3” type decline back to new lows.

My expectation is that the area near $96.50 should limit gains in WTI Crude (the chart below is a two-hour chart of the WTI Crude front-month futures contract).

Thereafter, a selloff down to undercut the most recent lows in the high $70’s likely gets underway.

While downside projections are difficult to make without having a clear picture of how high this minor bounce can carry, my expectation is that $58 for WTI wouldn’t be an unreasonable downside target if/when $96.50 holds on Tuesday’s bounce attempt.

If/when Crude starts to turn down sharply, it’s likely that the Energy sector will start to show more pronounced weakness into May. This likely should prove short-lived but ultimately will represent an attractive risk/reward for WTI Crude.

Light Crude Oil Futures

Source: TradingView

Energy’s underperformance likely will persist as Crude oil drops further into May

One of the more dramatic sector About-face movements that has occurred in 2026 has been seen understandably in Energy.

The former 30% return in the Energy sector has now been trimmed to 24.7% (Equal-weighted Energy ETF (RSPG 1.66% ) through 4/20/26 as Energy has been “hands-down” the worst performing sector out of all 11, given Crude’s big selloff.

As seen below, the early-year breakout in Energy, which caused the outperformance in this ratio chart of Energy vs. ^SPX -0.73%  (both in Equal-weighted terms), has largely been cut in half over the past month, but still could face further weakness to test this former downtrend if/when WTI Crude oil pulls back more on a more durable Iranian cease-fire proposal.

My expectation is for further near-term weakness in Energy before it begins to show much strength, and one has to be ultra-selective on what to own given this recent volatility.

RSPG/RSP

Source: Symbolik

OIH looks to outperform XOP given the possibility of further Crude oil weakness

Taking a look at the ratio of OIH 2.49%  to XOP 2.60%  (VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH 2.49% ) vs. the State Street SPDR S&P Oil and Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP 2.60% ) it’s clear that OIH 2.49%  looks to be turning sharply higher vs. XOP 2.60%  in ratio form and should be favored for relative outperformance in the months ahead.

Given my expectation of Crude oil dropping down to potentially $58/barrel, Exploration and Production stocks might face greater deterioration and show underperformance in the near-term.

This ratio has rallied to the highest levels in roughly five years.  Thus, OIH 2.49%  should be favored for outperformance, and despite the possibility of Energy falling further in performance on an absolute and relative basis, OIH looks like a relative leader compared to XOP 2.60% .

OIH/XOP

Source: Symbolik

XLE has broken uptrends vs OIH, which should result in additional underperformance from Integrated Oil names

One fascinating ratio chart I always utilize within Energy concerns the ratio of the SPDR S&P Select Energy ETF (XLE 1.51% ) vs. VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH 2.49% ) for a gauge as to what sub-sectors might be starting to show outperformance or underperformance within Energy.

As shown below, XLE 1.51%  has been a steady underperformer and has just broken the uptrend vs. OIH 2.49% , with this ratio falling to the lowest levels since 2024.

While the ratio did move fractionally higher following the initial start of the Iran war, it has since plummeted back to new multi-month lows in the last few weeks.

The decline does not look complete, given the recent break of this lengthy uptrend, coupled with a lack of DeMark-based exhaustion signals, which might give a clue as to a possible turn in this ratio.

Thus, Oil Service stocks based on the first ratio of OIH 2.49%  vs. XOP 2.60% , along with the second ratio of XLE 1.51%  vs OIH 2.49% , look to be preferred for those looking for a way to play Energy.

While I do expect Energy to weaken further into May, OIH 2.49%  should be the sub-sector that might show better relative strength.

XLE/OIH

Source: Symbolik
Disclosures (show)
This research is for the clients of Fundstrat Global Advisors only. For additional information, please contact your sales representative or Fundstrat Global Advisors at 150 East 52nd Street, New York, NY, 10022 USA.

To unsubscribe from this email, please click here. You can also manage your email preferences and opt out of other types of emails by clicking here.

Analyst Certification (Reg AC)
Mark L. Newton, CMT AC, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report, hereby certifies that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his personal views, which have not been influenced by considerations of the firm’s business or client relationships. Neither I, nor a member of my household is an officer, director, or advisory board member of the issuer(s) or has another significant affiliation with the issuer(s) that is/are the subject of this research report. There is a possibility that we will from time to time have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research.
Conflicts of Interest
This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of Fundstrat. At the time of publication of this report, Fundstrat does not know of, or have reason to know of any material conflicts of interest.
General Disclosures
Fundstrat Global Advisors is an independent research company and is not a registered investment advisor and is not acting as a broker-dealer under any federal or state securities laws. Fundstrat Global Advisors is a member of IRC Securities’ Research Prime Services Platform. IRC Securities is a FINRA registered broker-dealer that is focused on supporting the independent research industry. Certain personnel of Fundstrat (i.e., Research Analysts) are registered representatives of IRC Securities, a FINRA member firm registered as a broker-dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and certain state securities regulators. As registered representatives and independent contractors of IRC Securities, such personnel may receive commissions paid to or shared with IRC Securities for transactions placed by Fundstrat clients directly with IRC Securities or with securities firms that may share commissions with IRC Securities in accordance with applicable SEC and FINRA requirements. IRC Securities does not distribute the research of Fundstrat, which is available to select institutional clients that have engaged Fundstrat. As registered representatives of IRC Securities, our analysts must follow IRC Securities' Written Supervisory Procedures. Notable compliance policies include (1) prohibition of insider trading or the facilitation thereof, (2) maintaining client confidentiality, (3) archival of electronic communications, and (4) appropriate use of electronic communications, amongst other compliance related policies. Fundstrat does not have the same conflicts that traditional sell-side research organizations have because Fundstrat (1) does not conduct any investment banking activities, (2) does not manage any investment funds, and (3) our clients are only institutional investors. This research is for the clients of Fundstrat Global Advisors only. Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Fundstrat Global Advisors does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to Fundstrat and the analyst's involvement (if any) with any of the subject companies of the research. All pricing is as of the market close for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, risk tolerance, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies.
The recipient of this report must make its own independent decision regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein.
Except in circumstances where Fundstrat expressly agrees otherwise in writing, Fundstrat is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice, including within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client website, fundstrat.com. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or made available to third-party aggregators or the media. Please contact your sales representative if you would like to receive any of our research publications.
No part of this material may be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the prior written consent of Fundstrat Global Advisors LLC.